Data
DATA
Numbers don’t lie. Spin does.
ESG Impact and transparency
Data is what makes ESG impact verifiable — not a backdrop, not window dressing. Every indicator we publish comes with what it needs to mean something: a clear definition, a reporting period, a source, and an honest account of its limits.
KPIs
Accountability figures, not highlights.
Every number below is an accountability figure, not a headline. Each one carries a definition, a source, and a reporting period.
METHOD IN USE
Current version of the ESG Impact method applied to verified cases.
Validity from: 17.02.2026
VERIFIED PROJECTS
Companies or products that have completed the full certification process within the reporting period.
Period: last 12 months/selected window
PROJECTS UNDER REVIEW
Companies or products currently working through the certification process.
Period: last 12 months/selected window
METHODOLOGY REVISIONS
Published revisions to the method — release notes and changelog entries that changed definitions or indicators.
Version count and documented corrections
ACTIVE PILOTS
Live experiments running in the Prosocial Lab: cases used to stress-test new indicators or extend the model.
Period and progress status
ESG KPIs TRACKED
ESG impact indicators currently monitored across companies and products within the PackInPro scope.
Broken down by E, S, G and auditability level
Dig into the data → Methodological Note
CALLOUT
How to read these figures
These KPIs measure accountability, not achievement. They show where we stand in making ESG impact verifiable — not how well we’re doing at telling our own story.
Every indicator links to its definition, reporting period, source, and stated limitations in the methodological note.
Every figure here is defined, dated, and versioned.
The Data page always links back to method and limitations — no indicator without context, source, and update rules.